Perbandingan Akurasi Metode TOPSIS dan Metode Weight Product untuk Menentukan Siswa Berprestasi

  • Abdul Fatahillah Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
  • Mudafiq Riyan Pratama Politeknik Negeri Jember
Keywords: Comparison, Accuracy, TOPSIS, Weight Product, Student Achievement

Abstract

In determining outstanding students (a case study at MTs. Al-Ishlah Jenggawah Jember) there are several criteria to be assessed. The criteria contained in student achievement in MTs. Al-Ishlah includes the average report card, behavior, discipline, neatness and attendance. For the sake of subjective assessment, an appropriate method is needed, namely the Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Weight Product (WP). The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of TOPSIS and WP, ​​where each assessment in this case is that all students are compared with one another, thus providing an output of priority values ​​that produce a rating value for each student. After comparison and analysis, the accuracy of both methods was obtained, namely the TOPSIS method was 84% ​​while the WP method obtained an accuracy value of 87.5%. This means that in the case study, the determination of outstanding students is carried out at MTs. Al-Ishlah Jenggawah Jember showed that the WP method was better than the TOPSIS method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asmara, Pembelajaran yang Efektif. Jakarta: Renika Cipta, 2009.

Harjati, Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2008.

Kusumadewi, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006.

V. Gayatri and M. Chetan, “Comparative Study of Different Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Theory Eng., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 2319 – 2526, 2013.

Published
2020-09-30
How to Cite
Fatahillah, A., & Pratama, M. R. (2020). Perbandingan Akurasi Metode TOPSIS dan Metode Weight Product untuk Menentukan Siswa Berprestasi. BIOS : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 1(2), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.37148/bios.v1i2.31
Section
Articles